Parecer Jurídico

Abstract

This is a query formulated by Caio. It questions whether there is a possibility of the Federal Supreme Court again prohibiting the practice of vaquejada, even though the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) was approved, which amended the Federal Constitution to allow the referred practice in the sporting and cultural modality; It inquires if the PROCON of Fortaleza-CE acted correctly when denying service to it, claiming that it was not the consumer consultant in the relationship maintained with a car rental company; Requests clarification on the arbitration process and whether this technique can be applied to resolve the conflict that arose between the consultant and the vehicle rental company, as well as whether the latter must indemnify the latter in relation to damages suffered to the leased vehicle after involvement in a traffic accident; Finally, it asks if Law 13.546/2017 affects the process in which Sérgio (causer of the traffic accident in which the consultant was involved), is responsible for the murder committed against Cíntia, helping or harming the defendant.